Skip to main content

Department of Post tweaks tender to woo tech companies for payment bank


NEW DELHI: The Department of Post (DoP), which is racing against time to ready its Payment Bank, has had to re-tender its technology contract after it failed to get bids from any of the major Indian technology firms such as Infosys, Wipro, TCS or the multinationals. 

In its first attempt to find a technology vendor to build the backbone for its ambitious payment bank, DoP found itself in a single bid situation – with the lone application of Polaris India. The development may push the launch of the postal payment bank by another few months giving a lead to its rivals — Paytm and Airtel — which are about to start soon. 

Officials of technology companies told ET that they decided to give the opportunity a miss since the contract didn’t make “business sense” and its terms and conditions were very “vague” and “open ended”. An executive of one of the top IT firms said that the department is under a lot of pressure to start the operations and wanted the implementation to happen within six weeks, which is impossible for companies to pull off. 

“They wanted the IPR of the banking platform to be handed over to them, nobody will do that,” said the executive who requested anonymity. The person added that who funds the cash flow was also very adverse and there were lots of other sticky issues. “We are looking for a fair agreement and it was not fair,” said the person. As per the current plan, India Post Payments Bank (IPPB) - as it has been termed - will eventually have 650 branches across the country. The department has to submit a final proposal to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) – which had granted it in-principal approval in August 2015 – before March 2017. 

Another official of a large tech company said, “While all of us are Indians and we want to work for the country, it should also make business sense. We are making 15-20% profit on an international contract, our CFO will agree even if we are making about 10% margin in a domestic contract, but if they put a lot of conditions making even that much profit will be virtually impossible.” 

The executive who also requested anonymity said the contract took a very long term view on the payment terms with approval cycles only running close to 200 days to 300 days. “It required to be signed off by different people which is not a sellable model.” The person added that another point of contention was that it imposed “unlimited liability” on the vendors. The department of Post could not be reached for a comment. 

Posts has now come up with a fresh tender last week and officials said that they are currently studying the feasibility of it and will take a call in a few days on whether to be participate in it. “It looks better than last time, but we are still studying the `details,” said the first official quoted above. The RBI gave in-principle approval to 11applicants in August last year, including the Department of Posts, Aditya Birla Nuvo, Airtel M Commerce Services, Fino PayTech, National Securities Depository, Reliance IndustriesTech Mahindra and Vodafone m-pesa, for setting up payments banks. Three of the 11entities have already decided to back out, citing unviability. Alibaba-backed Paytm had appointed Infosys and its core banking software Finacle in June this year and is planning to launch its Payment Bank around Diwali.

Source : http://economictimes.indiatimes.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Duties and additional duties of Postman----for information of all supervisory cadre

  DG(P) No.11-1/2010-Admn dated 18-11-2010 NO.25-20/2008-PE-I Government of India Ministry of Communications & IT Department of Posts (Establishment Division)                                                                                                        Dak Bhavan, Sansad Marg                                                                                          New Delhi                                                                                                       Dated 25.11.2008   TO              All Heads of Circles/Regions,   Subject: Additional duties for Postman/Delivery Staff.                                       On account of changes in work scenario of the Post offices brought about due to the induction of technology and primacy of business products, the duties and responsibilities of the postman have undergone a vast change. In order to incorporate these changes, the following duties are prescribed in addition to t
ENHANCEMENT OF FINANCIAL POWERS OF HSG, HSG-II AND LSG POST MASTERS ( THESE ORDERS ARE IN FORCE. NO REVISION TAKES PLACE SINCE 21 YEARS) A reference is invited to Circular No.62-8/64-CI dated 20.10.1965 delegating financial powers to HSG and LSG Postmasters to incur expenditure of a contingent nature on the following items: a) Replacing, repairing, cleaning, oiling, shifting of electric lights and fittings, fans etc. of the office in a rented building when the charge is a Government liability. b) Repairs of Department bicycles. c) Purchase of earthen pots, glass tumblers, dusters, brooms etc. d) Purchase and repairs to furniture. e) Emergent arrangements for conveyance of mails. 2. The question of enhancement of the powers were being examined in the Directorate in view of the rise in the prices and it has been decided to enhance the powers given to HSG & LSG Postmasters from Rs.30 & Rs.20/- respectively on each occasion to Rs.60/- & Rs.40/- respectively on each o
GRANT OF TA & TRANSIT (TA & TP) TO OFFICIALS TRANSFERRED ON COMPLETION OF TENURE TO THE PLACE OF THEIR CHOICE . A proposal on grant TA and transit to officials who are transferred on completion of tenure to the place of their choice was under consideration in this Directorate for sometime past.      SR-114 governs TA on transfer distinguishes between transfer for public convenience and transfer on own request.  Although transfer on completion of tenure in one office has not been specifically referred to in this rule, yet the transfer on completion of tenure is a transfer for public convenience.  On completion of tenure, the official has to be transferred out for operational reasons.  Therefore, such a transfer is mandatory, while posting to a place of choice is secondary and subject to public convenience.  In view of this posting to a place of choice after completion of full tenure may not be normally termed as a "transfer on own request" under SR-114.      It